Monday, January 17, 2011

The Man with One Suede Shoe


When people find out that my wife and I are the parents of triplets, we are reminded that our professors and managers were wrong; there are such things as stupid questions.   Consider the following questions/statements that are posed to us on a somewhat regular basis:

  1. “Are they natural?” No, they are synthetic.  This is sometimes asked as “did you have any help?” Of course people want to know if our kids were the result of fertility treatments.  I think you would agree that this is a pretty personal matter. As such, I think it is a stupid question.  And, for the record, I was once told that I have immature sperm, which, if you know me, you realize that this diagnosis is spot on.
  2. “Is it hard having triplets?” The stupidity of this question does not even dignify a response. How could it possibly be easy going from zero to three children in a matter of three minutes? 
  3. “Well, better you than me.” Honestly, this is an insulting comment.  We love our kids and while it is hard to raise three kids of the same age, they bring us immeasurable joy.


One question, though, that I don’t mind so much is when people ask me “What was their first month like?”  When people ask it this way, it recognizes the obvious (that it must have been difficult) while at the same time shows that they have in interest in the kids as well. 

What does this have to do with moderating?  I am getting to it!

Their first month of life was hectic. I was a zombie and my wife and I did not get much sleep – at all.  One day, I went to work and it wasn’t until noon when I realized I was wearing two completely different shoes; one suede shoe and one non-suede shoe. 

I felt like such an ass.  I was completely self-conscious and felt as if all eyes were on me.  I literally did not leave my office for fear of being outed as the man with one suede shoe. 

Remembering this makes me question how much of our behavior is on autopilot. Yet, it strikes me that for a living I constantly ask people to describe their behavior and explain it.  Under normal circumstances, I could not tell you what pair of shoes I wore yesterday – it would be a complete guess. However, I can tell you exactly which shoes I wore 8 years ago because of the suede shoe incident.

This makes me wonder, would I get more reliable information out of consumers if I asked them to change their behavior for a week leading up to an interview/discussion group.  For example, if I were doing groups for a shoe company and we were talking to loyalists of that manufacturer, would we be better off asking those consumers to stop wearing that brand for a full week in order to better explain the benefits they receive from those consumers? Perhaps tension can be a good thing.  What do you think?

Wednesday, January 5, 2011

Don't be a Club Member


I started my career in marketing research at an interactive marketing agency in Westport, CT known at the time as Modem Media.  It was there I saw my first focus group and, upon doing so, I knew immediately that I wanted to be the person in the room asking questions rather than the person taking notes behind the glass.  As such, I studied everything I could about moderating and facilitating techniques, I picked the brains of the moderators I would hire to run research for me, and I even self funded my own training at RIVA. 

All of these steps were invaluable in my development as a moderator.  Interestingly, though, none of the training I had, formal or informal, prepared me for how to deal with what I call “Club Member” respondents.  Allow me to digress for a minute:

When I was a kid, my family would drive from Connecticut to Pompano Beach, Florida during our spring recess from school.  The route was exactly 1,307 miles door to door.  Along the way, the family would play three games to hold our attention:

  • See who could spot the first billboard for South of the Border featuring the infamous (that’s more than famous) Pedro.


  • See how long dad could drive without passing out.    My mother learned early on that “Hooked on Classical Music 3” was not the best tape to play on long, straight, monotonous drives.  Dad almost killed us three times one year via “Highway Hypnosis.”

  •  Count the number of “Club Members” we could spot along the way.


“What’s a club member?” you might ask.  Well, let’s just say my father has a bit of a temper and when some one would cut us off on the highway or if someone was weaving in an out of their lane, he would call them a member of the “[Bleep] hole Club.” My mother, concerned for the well being of the two young sons in the back seat, would chastise my father for using such language.  To appease her, he shortened his reference to bad drivers to the more simple, and innocent, “Club Member.” Every now and then a particularly bad driver was considered to be either the president of “The Club,” an executive director, or another type of member with distinction.

Seeing as this was the 80’s, I could not help but picture a meeting of “The Club” with all members dressed in Members Only jackets going up to each other and saying, “So you are a[Bleep] hole too. How long have you been a [Bleep] hole for?”

Those were the days.

Now I am all grown up and experience club members in different ways; certainly I run across a few “Club Members” in my own family car trips, but every now and then they wind up in a focus group I am running.  These are not “dominators.” There are techniques for dealing with dominators.   The “Club Member” of a focus group is typically a respondent on a completely different plane of reality.  It is that person who does not follow simple instructions or who wants the group to be all about him or her - as if they are going to be “discovered” by the Hollywood agent behind the glass who has turned to marketing research as a new method for spotting talent.

Luckily, I only see “Club Members” in one out of every twenty projects or so as the true “Cub Member” is few and far between.  One time, about three years ago, I was in a northeastern market conducting some focus groups on coffee.  In walks a young man who I can only describe as a cross between officer John Baker from CHIPS (immortalized of course by Larry Wilcox) and Jeff Spicoli from Fast Times at Ridgemont High.  “Officer Spicoli” comes in with mirrored shades, a large coffee, sits down, puts his feet on the table and proclaims, “I’m here dudes. Lets talk about coffee.”

I knew I was in for trouble. The natural instinct is to bump him from the group immediately, but he was one of two people who showed up for this group on a very stormy Philadelphia morning.  Compounding the problem was that the other person in the session came with the aforementioned Spicoli. Fortunately, a few more people showed up but I was asked by my client to keep him in the group but to “manage him,” so we trudged on.  The danger was that his attitude had the potential of shutting down the other members of the group who wanted to be a force for good in the conversation. 

To mange this, I used humor to my advantage and took slight jabs at Spicoli during the session.  Take for example the following exchange:

Mike:  “I want each of you to take me back to the first time you ever had a sip of   coffee.  What drove you to coffee? What was that experience like.”

Spicoli: “I started drinking coffee when I was two.”

Mike (sarcastically): “Well, that certainly explains it.”

The truth is, this respondent knew he was a bit off and banter such as this disarmed him somewhat. Not only that, it loosened up other members of the group who were at first put off by his behavior.  At the end of the day, the group turned out okay.  That said, there is no doubt about it, Spicoli was certainly a card-carrying member of “The Club.”

In a project of one on one interviews, I met “Crazy Alice,” a corrections officer from Ohio.  Apparently, Alice had been exposed to some pretty strange stuff in the prison where she worked because she had developed a conspiracy theory whereby there was a syndicate of Internet based organized criminals out there who were using Cyrillic Alphabets as a method of coding organized crime activities:

Mike:    “Tell me about some of the reasons why you engage with social media services like Facebook.”

Alice:     “I originally started hacking to combat cyber organized crime.”

Mike (Internally to myself): I don’t remember asking her about hacking, but lets see where this goes…

Alice:   “Haven’t you ever received an email with a bunch of funny characters in the preview pane.  Don’t open it, you will be linked to human trafficking.”

Mike (internally to myself): I wish some traffickers would storm into this room and take you away. 

The whole time this interview was going on, I thought a client would come in to the room and stop the interview.  No such luck.  As I walked the respondent out to the reception area, I half expected her to be greeted by a team of psychiatric aides from Ohio Hospital for Psychiatry with the phrase, “Alice, you know you can’t leave the ward without supervision.”

That didn’t happen either.  Crazy Alice was just another Club member I had to interview over the years. 

As a moderator, my life is on the road so I come across “Club Members” outside of focus groups as well; airports in particular are a great place spot to them!  The guy in front of you who argues with the TSA agent about having to remove his shoes, the gate agent who thinks your roller board bag won’t fit in the overhead bin even though after a million miles of flying you know it will, and the fellow passenger sitting next to you on the plane who wants to chit chat about “this, that, and the other” are just a few examples.  By the way, I have developed a technique to prevent the latter. If I have a lot of work to do on a flight or just want to chill out, I develop a nervous tick the minute someone sits next to me on a plane.  This usually prevents them from starting a conversation with me.

I have some other tips for dealing with “Club Members” in focus groups:

1.     The first step is always prevention.  Always ask the person at the front desk of a facility who is responsible for checking in respondents whether or not anyone seems off.  Pay and send that person if you have over recruited for the session and have the ability to do so.
2.     If someone starts showing the symptoms of being a “Club Member,” use body language to your advantage; don’t look in their general direction, don’t make eye contact, etc.  If they start rambling, provide a gentle verbal warning such as, “thank you for that comment, but I need to hear from some others in the group” and then invite others to chime in.  Sometimes calling them out on their own behavior is enough to get them to stop.
3.     If the respondent in question continues to act up/be disruptive, ask them to leave the session.  While this can be somewhat uncomfortable for the remaining respondents, there is little fear of “survivors guilt” coming into play.  If the respondent was truly disruptive, than the group will be relieved that the offender is gone. 

I have come to realize that “Club Members” are a fact of life.  I wish that one of the pharmaceutical companies I do work for could invest some of their resources to develop a pill, an injection, or even a mist as an antidote (or better yet an immunization) for whatever microbe causes one to become a “Club Member.” I would be happy to run that project pro-bono. 

If you have any “Club Member” stories that you would like to share, please do so below!

Tuesday, January 4, 2011

I have become a Stalker

Way back when in November, I took a meeting with a potential client and all in all, it was a pretty good meeting.  They asked me to prepare a point of view on the field of shopper insights so I (diligently of course) drafted what I thought was a wicked smart approach to helping them address their business issues.  I sent the proposal, followed up with a phone call, and waited.

...and waited
...and waited
...and waited

Until I was done with waiting.  I then called once a week for two weeks.  Mind you, I am not desperate for business, I simply wanted to hear what they thought of my thinking.  It was making me anxious that I may have been so off the mark that they must have laughed when they received it.  I decided to offer my anxiety up to the souls of purgatory (not really, but my mom will be happy that I said I did) and let it go.

Cut to a few weeks later - I hit some traffic on the way to the train station and took a later train than usual. While standing on the platform, something in my peripheral vision caught my attention.  It was a man - but not just any man - it was the prospect I met with about a month earlier; at least I thought it was. My wife will be the first person to tell you that I often say "doesn't that person remind you of so and so?" while her response is typically, "No, not really." She does not even try to sugar coat her response either.  As you can see, I am used to both personal and professional rejection, but  digress.

I, however, was convinced it was him. For the sake of argument, lets call him Don Diego Vega.  I stepped on the train, took a seat, and, to my amazement, Zorro took a seat in front of me.  I poked my head over the seat periodically to see whether or not there was anything that would confirm his identify (logo on briefcase, name on laptop, DNA sample, sword) - NADA.

As the trained entered the tunnel between 125th street and Grand Central, I noticed my "mark" stand up and wait by the door. That's when the idea hit me, I would follow him to his office, unmask him (in my mind of course) and confirm his identify.

He stepped off the train first and I followed him (after flipping the collar of my black coat up of course).  I then followed him to the main hall of Grand Central.  He went right whereas I typically would have gone left but no matter.  Now I really did not think he was going to look around to see if he had a "tail" on "his six," but periodically I stopped on our walk and pretended to play with my iPhone.  (Hey, I lead a relatively boring life, allow me this simple pleasure).

Well, I followed him all the way up Park Avenue and watched him step into the building I had visited just a few weeks before. So I was right after-all,  too bad I did not have the cajones to stop him on the street and ask him about my document.

At any rate, I did finally hear through the grapevine that their budgets were slashed and that is why he did not respond.

Have you ever stalked a client or potential employer for that matter? Please share.

Questions for the Ages


Now that the holidays are over and I am settling into my new organization, I vow to devote more time to updating this blog.  Maybe vow is too strong a word, perhaps I will just promise to update it more often.  It seems that breaking a promise (with a decent enough reason) sounds more acceptable than breaking a vow (just ask Tiger Woods).

I recently ran a series of focus groups on hot dog packaging and wouldn’t you know it, in every group someone raised the question, “why aren't hot dogs and buns packaged in the same quantities?”

It’s a question for the ages. I am actually surprised that no one criticized them for being different sizes.  What is the line on that anyway? In my mind, it is okay for the hot dog to be bigger than the bun but not okay for the bun to be bigger than the hot dog.  No one mentioned that though – perhaps size doesn’t matter after all. Perhaps I should ask one of Tiger Woods' mistresses.

It is easy to dismiss these relatively minor issues people have with products (after all, having a few more hot dogs or a few extra buns isn’t the end of the world) but when you start to see a pattern emerging, I think it is time to pay attention and make a change.  A few more issues I hear repeated often:

  • Why can the cereal companies use a Ziploc closure on internal cereal bags to keep dry cereal fresher?
  • If your car can tell you that one more of your tires has low pressure, why can’t it tell you which tires actually have low pressure?
  •  Can’t they make the entire plane out of the stuff the back box is made of?


Perhaps the last one actually has the laws of physics working against it, but you get the point. What would you add to this list?